Australia should have invited Sarah Palin instead of Oprah Winfrey
Posted August 14, 2011on:
It’s been a three million dollar wastage!
Tourism Australia’s much touted windfall from Oprah Winfrey’s Ultimate Australian Adventure failed to materialize. Much to the chagrin of the officials who pushed for it. But then, the Aussies picked the wrong American celebrity.
Instead of inviting Oprah who is winding down, they should have asked Governor Sarah Palin to tour the island continent, and imbue it with some of the ascendant politician’s aura and celebrity.
Consider this: Oprah mostly appeals to women, children, and nutty leftwing domesticated individuals and the artsy crowd. Whereas Sarah Palin appeals to men, women and children in all walks of life, specially the adventuresome ones.
Sarah Palin would have been perfectly at home in the legendary Australian outback. As a genuine outdoors person, athlete and brave heart she fits right in with the world’s idea of an Aussie. Actually the fact that she comes from one of the coldest parts of the world will have had added fascination for the people of Australia. Indeed, only a genuinely activity oriented, physically engaged person such as Sarah Palin would have fully appreciated the finer aspects of Australia’s rugged beauty.
Alaska and Australia are the perfect bookends weather-wise. One might even say they are truly poles apart. That alone would have made Sarah Palin an excellent choice. Her television shows on Alaska are amazing. There can be no doubt that an entire segment of humanity now thinks of Alaska differently, even some right here at home. It’s really the last place for frontiersperson after all.
Australians were misadvised. I think. Oprah is no doubt a world-wide phenomenon. But this Aussie trip probably helped Oprah’s ratings more than Australia’s. Too bad that it’s too late for this mistake to be corrected what with the election season coming up. (And we know the Governor is planning something.)